Bad paintings of Barack Obama

Bill Barol at 4:22 PM March 9, 2010

Bill Barol (email, Twitter) is the author of Mr. Irresponsible's Bad Advice: How to Rip the Lid Off Your Id and Live Happily Ever After (Volt Press). He’s a former senior writer at Newsweek and his journalism has appeared in The New Yorker, Time, Slate, and elsewhere.

37.jpg

If you're an epochal historical figure you are in some sense going to be all things to all people, and it stands to reason that some of those people will be painters, and of those, some quotient will be bad painters. Which is what makes badpaintingsofbarackobama.com not just a hoot but culturally inevitable. It's ultra-minimalist, as online galleries go -- just a bad painting of Obama per page, with a neat little drop shadow added to give the images an extra shot of hilarious self-importance. Some of them actually aren't bad (at least not to my untrained eye -- I don't know a lot about bad painting, but I know it when I see it); some are either goofy (like this one of Obama looking like Mr. Roarke from "Fantasy Island") or disturbing (like this one of Obama looking like The Rock). Some of them are actually sort of moving. Taken individually they're easy to dismiss. But click through the site for a while and something unexpected happens: Your image of Obama begins to lift and separate from the mire and chatter of the 24-hour news cycle, and you begin to see him again as (perhaps) you once did -- the repository of a whole lot of different, and different-looking, hopes.

12 Comments Add a comment

ian71 #1 16:54 on Tue, Mar. 9 Reply

Wasn't this site already blogged on here a while back?

Also, tacos?? WTF??

rrh #2 16:59 on Tue, Mar. 9 Reply
Anon #3 17:01 on Tue, Mar. 9 Reply

Underpants?

Anon #4 17:14 on Tue, Mar. 9 Reply

this reminds me of david byrne's painting for the cover of "little creatures." i think it's the underwear.

Anon #5 17:20 on Tue, Mar. 9 Reply

I don't think any of these paintings are bad, and I'm curious to know what a "good" painting of Barack Obama would look like.

bklynchris #6 17:41 on Tue, Mar. 9 Reply

How 'bout bad paintings, period. Actually, this painting is so bad its good. F*ck the tacos, what about the jockey underwear?

jere7my replied to comment from Anonymous #7 22:09 on Tue, Mar. 9 Reply

Anon #4, Byrne didn't paint the cover of Little Creatures. That was the Reverend Howard Finster, an outsider artist from Georgia. If you like that kind of thing, Google [outsider art].

Zergonapal #8 22:32 on Tue, Mar. 9 Reply

I think its interesting that the one consistent about the paintings is Obama's smile.
Oh and number four made me laugh out loud, someone has a serious crush on Obama.

Anon #9 04:15 on Wed, Mar.10 Reply

Hey, there's a work-in-progress photo of Alex Grey's Obama portrait in there as well.

http://iamchriscollins.com/badpaintingsofbarackobama/images//3.jpg
http://www.alexgrey.com/obama.html

Steaming Pile replied to comment from bklynchris #10 08:14 on Wed, Mar.10 Reply

Yeah, what's the deal with the underwear?

Chinese Jet Pilot #11 08:21 on Wed, Mar.10 Reply

I find these Obama paintings quite honest and charming in a folk-art way.

I snapped this lovely 3D photo of an Obama painting and its creator.

Ned613 #12 12:14 on Wed, Mar.10 Reply

Anon@#3 "Underpants?" Evidently change [of underwear] we can believe in.

Add a comment

Anonymous

Read the full moderation policy. Thank you!

• Obama • Painting

Features

Reviews Videos

More Features